Participles
| Present | fugjents |
| Past | fugatos |
Verbal nouns
| tu-derivative | fugatum |
| s-derivative | fugjezi |
Active
Indicative Present
| 1st sing. | fugjō |
| 2nd sing. | fugjes |
| 3rd sing. | fugjet |
| 1st plur. | fugjomos |
| 2nd plur. | fugjetes |
| 3rd plur. | fugjont |
Subjunctive Present
| 1st sing. | fugjām |
| 2nd sing. | fugjās |
| 3rd sing. | fugjād |
| 1st plur. | fugjāmos |
| 2nd plur. | fugjātes |
| 3rd plur. | fugjānd |
Indicative Perfect
| 1st sing. | fougai |
| 2nd sing. | fougistai? |
| 3rd sing. | fougei |
| 1st plur. | fougme? |
| 2nd plur. | fouge |
| 3rd plur. | fougēri |
Imperative Present
Passive
Indicative Present
| 1st sing. | fugjōr |
| 2nd sing. | fugjezo |
| 3rd sing. | fugjetor |
| 1st plur. | fugjomor |
| 2nd plur. | fugjem(e?)n(ai?) |
| 3rd plur. | fugjontor |
Subjunctive Present
| 1st sing. | fugjār |
| 2nd sing. | fugjāzo |
| 3rd sing. | fugjātor |
| 1st plur. | fugjāmor |
| 2nd plur. | fugjām(e?)n(ai?) |
| 3rd plur. | fugjāntor |
Imperative Present
Etymology
From Proto-Indo-European *bʰewg-. More specifically, the term may reflect Proto-Indo-European *bʰug-yé-ti, though Leppänen argues that—since it is the only evidence of a ye-present for this root—it may actually have been formed innovatively within Italic from the root aorist. De Vaan alternatively derives the term from an athematic i-present of the shape *bʰug-i-. The Latin perfect form fūgī might continue an original PIE athematic root aorist *bʰéwg-t ~ *bʰug-ént, which would—by regular sound change—produce a Proto-Italic ablauting aorist *fouged ~ *fugond. However, due the lack of Sabellic evidence, it is not possible to empirically verify the existence of this variation. De Vaan also suggests that the Latin perfect form might continue a PIE perfect of the shape *(bʰe)bʰowg-.
Verbs referencing "fugjō"
Latin
fugio.
Cognates
-